The overall goal of Core Project III is to develop practical methods for computing objective measures of image quality rapidly and to use these methods to quantify task performance for CGRI imaging systems and those of our collaborators using realistic, dynamic object models. To promote the widespread use of the methodologies to be developed under this project, the software tools, protocols, and phantoms will be made available to our collaborators and other researchers in medical imaging on our Image
Quality Website.
|
Task |
Data Set |
Observer(s) |
FOM |
ComputationalMethods |
Comments |
Status as of
March 2008 |
|
SKE/BKE
detection |
Raw
projection data |
Ideal
obs, Hotelling, CHO |
AUC,
SNR2 |
Pure
theory
(requires
only mean image) |
Easy
to compute, stylized task misleading |
Routine |
|
SKE/BKE
detection |
Reconstructed
images |
Hotelling,
CHO |
AUC,
SNR2 |
Noise-propagationalgorithms |
Stylized
task may be misleading |
Routine |
|
SKE
detection in a lumpy background |
Simulated
project data |
Ideal
obs, CHO |
AUC,
SNR2 |
MCMC
for IO, matrix inversion for Hotelling |
MCMC
is time- consuming |
Routine |
|
Detection
with location uncertainty |
Simulated
planar images or reconstructions. |
Scanning
CHO or ideal |
ALROC |
MCMC
, channelized IO |
MCMC
and CIO both time consuming |
Routine |
|
Estimation
of activity in ROI |
Raw
projection data or reconstructions. |
Wiener, channelized Wienner, MLm MAP, posterioe mean. |
Variance,
EMSE or CR bound |
Object models, precomputed
template, MCMC |
ROI
defined independently on anatomical image |
Routine |
Estimation
of tumor volume
|
Raw
projection data or reconstructions. |
Wiener, channelized Wienner, MLm MAP, posterioe mean. |
Variance,
EMSE or CR bound |
Object models, precomputed
template, MCMC |
“Volume”
difficult to define |
Routine |
|
Estimation
of tumor locations |
Raw
projection data or reconstructions. |
Wiener, channelized Wienner, MLm MAP, posterioe mean. |
Variance,
EMSE or CR bound |
Object models, precomputed
template, MCMC |
|
Routine |
|
No-gold-std.
evaluation methodologies |
Reconstructedimages |
Image-
analysis software |
Adjusted
variance |
Maximum
likelihood |
Needs
to be widely disseminated |
Well
validated theoretically and experimentally
|
|
MRMC
statistics |
ROC
data |
First-principles
approach |
NA |
FDA: One-shot algorithm, BGRI: bootstrap/least squares |
Passed
validation tests |
Emerging
as standard; combined method developed at FDA
|
|
Estimation
of kinetic parameters |
Dynamic
projection data or reconstructions. |
Wiener, ML, GM, posterior mean, or adhoc estimators |
Variance,
EMSE or CR bound |
Global compartmental kinetic model |
|
Simulations
performed,
physical
phantom measured.
|
|
Estimation
of object statistics |
Projection
data for many animals |
NA
|
NA |
ML
estimation via characteristicfunctional |
Uses
analytic characteristic functional |
Demonstrated
in simulation |
Detection
and estimation of signal parameters
|
Projection
data or reconstructions
|
EROC ideal,
scanning MAP, ML or Hotelling
|
|
MCMC, matrix
methods for Hotelling
|
|
Simulations underway |
|
SKE
detection |
Addaptive sytem
data, raw projection data |
Adaptive
Hotelling, Adaptive CHO |
SNR |
MCMC
and matrix-inversion techniques |
Probably
practical for CHO only |
Theory developed, inital simulation studies completed |
|
Estimation |
Addaptive sytem
data |
Adaptive
Wiener or channelized Wiener estimator |
EMSE |
MCMC
and matrix inversion techniques |
Probably
practical in channelized case |
Theory developed and simulation planned |
Detection
and estimation in modified MOBY phantom |
FastSPECT II |
EROC Ideal, scanning MAP, ML, or Hotelling |
AEROC |
MCMC
and matrix inversion techniques |
Probably
need to channelize |
Planned |
(Top two figures) The performance of the Wiener estimator in the task of estimating position and size of a signal. The Wiener estimator is unable to use the image data to produce any reasonable estimates. (Bottom two figures) Performance of the scanning linear estimator for the same tasks. The new estimator is able to estimate the parameters.